Friday, April 24, 2009

Wind Farm Location


Closer View

I think this is an ideal place to place a wind farm for the following criteria:
According to :
Wind Energy Resource Atlas of the United States
Lake Superior
"The annual average wind power along Lake Superior shorelines is estimated to range from class 3 to class 5, with class 5 existing at exposed areas along the northern Keweenaw Peninsula, Isle Royale, and offshore areas of Lake Superior. In some areas, class 3 and 4 wind powers are estimated to occur at exposed sites 15 to 35 km (10 to 20 mi) inland from the shoreline. In the western part of Michigan's upper peninsula, the class 3 and 4 wind power areas represent exposed sites along the coast and in the Gogebic, Porcupine, and Huron mountains, where the wind power estimates are representative only of well-exposed sites on the higher elevations. "
Refference link for wind class :
the location i choose is around the GOGEBIC Area which has high wind powers.
With regards to the efffect of the wind farms to the bird population:
there are two types of birds that pass through these areas the Connecticut Warbler and the Tundra Swans. both birds reside on water or like water, the location i choose is far enough and has less vegetation so this area is very undesirable for this birds to fly over or stay.
Noise, Shadow flicker, Shipping impact, Landscape and Visual Impact:
The location is bassically in the middle of nowhere but have access roads thats a plus.
There are no close residental area so it could make all the noise and do all the shadow flickering it all wants.
Shipping impact: its an onshore Wind Farm so it wont really affect the shipping trade and it is far away from the shorelines.
Landscape and Visual Impact: there is not much to see in Gogebic, MI, so not much tourism going on and to get to the tourist attractions, people would take major highways rather that the back roads. People wont even know its there just like how everybody wants it.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Isohyet Map




Used: Manual Interpolation

I did a lot of eyeballing.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Flow Map

US map Projection used: Lambert Conformal Conic
World map Projection used : Robinson
Max width : 30 pt

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Cartogram

Continuous Cartogram , 10 Itereation
Used: Robinson Projection

Continuous Cartogram , Circular, Overlaping Polygons

Continuous Cartogram , Feature Shape, Overlaping Polygons

I think the circular non continuous is more appropriate to reperesent data but its crowded on some places especially Europe. And feature shape non continuous looks good on some places too....thats why i posted both.

I kept the original projections for the non continuous because i tried every recommended world projection and they all wont work properly.


Thursday, April 2, 2009

Dot Maps





Total dots : 1000
Dot value 7 Houses per square mile
(rounded up my values)

Wednesday, March 25, 2009



Used a predifined projection :Europe Lambert Conformal Conic
Used equal interval to classify data. The following countries are not on the given shapefile but included on the survey:Russia, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kryrgystan

Thursday, March 19, 2009

US Population Percentage by Division

It was required to used the a 5 equal interval Class but the 4th field on the legend value did not reperesent any Division. I think there is a better way to class the data. I went to http://www.colorbrewer.org/ to get the right shades (rgb) in using gray scale.